|
This is an article of interest to anyone who
owns a website, particularly if it is valuable. The idea that it can never be
stolen is misplaced. The idea that justice will prevail if you do not have the
financial means for a proper lawyer is also misplaced.
My brother and I originally obtained
domain name Look.com on April 19, 2004 from Network Solutions $75.00. We had a
fledgling antivirus business called Look Software, and who would have thought.
By 1999, dot com had exploded and the name was stolen by a former associate in
Look Software who promptly put it up for sale on the Internet for 15 million
bucks. Not a lie.
We were tipped off in the fall of 1999
that it was up for sale on a website called Greatdomains.com. I still have the
screen saves to prove it. Two BC millionaires (shiver, shiver) put up $50,000 to
help get it back and earned 50% ownership. We had all been expecting a nice big
juicy flip over because dot com was going crazy. However, by the time we got it
back, dot com had crashed and all our grandiose ideas about nice big juicy flip
overs were gone with the wind.
In the spring of 2000 I discovered it
stolen again. This time by someone unknown who had hacked into Network
Solution's server when they had first been taken over by Verio.com. Fortunately
I discovered it before any harm was done. Network Solutions put it straight back
with the caution that because Look.com was such a good name somebody would
always be trying to swipe it. No kidding.
In 2001 I decided to put Look.com up as
a search engine website because of the obvious ideal name usage. To help raise
funds I brought in a partner in 2002 to help raise funds. Who didn't raise a
penny and in desperation at the time (divorce, etc.) also went rogue near the
end of 2003 and abducted control of Look.com for himself. Where abduct means to
travel around in mysterious ways, usually with the property of another. Who
redirected my email address to himself in order to take over the ownership of
Look.com.
This time, because it was an inside
job, the Registrar Company, now Bulk Register, said, "Tough luck, go sue".
That’s all fine and dandy if you’re loaded. But the problem was in my case, that
when the partner took control of Look.com he also took control of the money
coming in. My bother and I were completely cut off from all sources of revenue
since we didn't have anything else going at the time and Old Age pension was
still a year away.
Since nature abhors a vacuum and empty
nostrils, we did what we had to do and immediately went out and started selling
flowers in bars and restaurants around town at the tender age of sixty four. How
many high end executives do you know who would hit the bars for dollars instead
of drinks when the going got rough? Fortunately we pulled it off. We always had
enough money for groceries and rent. But unfortunately nothing for expensive
things, like lawyers.
In desperation I tried for a year in
the hallowed halls of Justice as my own litigant with absolutely no previous
experience in the courts whatsoever. Where Justice means ‘Just Ice’. And true to
its creed I got eaten alive. The result was that I buried myself five feet out
of six. The two millionaires (shiver, shiver), P. Mathews of Vancouver Canada
and H. Stark of Kelowna Canada, or Peter M. and Harvey S. if you prefer, stepped
back in and said they would help get it back yet again. Who then had Greydie and
I sign over full ownership of Look.com to them after giving us their promises
and assurances that they would never try to sell Look.com out from under us if
we did.
Then sure
enough, on June 4, 2007, that's exactly what they did, using the very paper work
we had signed.
Fool me 119 times, shame on
you. Fool me 120 times shame on me.
They sold Look.com to an American Company called
InterSearch for around $575,000 grand. The problem was that by that time, the
courts had given my brother and my Company Look Software Systems Inc. sole
ownership of Look.com until 2013, and then Mathews and Stark (shiver, shiver)
ostensible ownership after that because of the paperwork we had signed.
What
Mathews and Stark did was use the 'after that' as though it were the 'here and
now’ to trick Inter Search into making the sweet deal based on the twisted
pretzel. The twisted pretzel comprised not only contempt of court because of the
ruling, but also criminal theft because of the sale. And also an outright con
job on everybody because of the monumental con job they had pulled on Greydie
and I to sign the papers like smiling crocodiles.
The other problem was that the courts
had also given the business partner the exclusive right to run the website until
2013, plus the right to sell it for our supposed mutual benefits as he saw fit.
He saw fit and sold the operating rights for $275, 000 large to the same
American company. The American Company therefore ended up owning the whole show.
It's really hard to figure that they didn't know exactly what the score was,
because they had all the paper work in front of them and aren't stupid.
Everybody's basic premise was that Greydie and I were now Old Age paupers with
only $1,200.00 a month each to live on. In other words we were chopped
liver.
I decided to go after Mathew and Stark
(shiver, shiver) though the court anyway, thinking the case was too cut and
dried to be a problem. This time I dug a full six foot hole. The court hearing
was definitely not one of those rare days when everything goes right. The judge
opened the hearing with the statement that self litigants aren’t qualified to
stand before the bench. And it went downhill like a rock on a ski slope from
there.
The end result was that Mathews and
Stark (shiver, shiver) got away Scot free. Likewise I can’t go into court now
for anything without leave of the court first, and only after posting a hefty
six to seven thousand dollar bond up front to boot. And you though your last
divorce was awful. This kind of censorship is the very absolute most prejudicial
thing a court can impose upon anyone. It was done in my case on the supposed
basis that I was a sic, serial litigator against (shiver, shiver) Mathews and
Stark, even though this was the first and only time I had ever been in court
against them. So what was that if it wasn’t a finger pointing due North.
Such an injunction is the kind of thing
a court only imposes upon a relentless self litigant who constantly comes back
to court time and again with a frivolous issue. It's the court room equivalent
of a restraining order against a stalker. For comparison, another party, John
Turmel, has self litigated in court hundreds of times during the last twenty
years over the legal right to use marihuana and has never received such an
injunction. The judge also awarded Mathews and Stark $7,500.00 in court costs,
even knowing I was completely impecunious. Another highly unprecedented action.
To say I got screwed is like saying getting mugged is fun.
I should have seen it coming though.
The law firm of Men and Partners, (something like that) who handled the case for
(shiver, shiver) Mathews and Stark were well known around town as a pocket full
of tricksters. Where trickster means knowing exactly who to pull favours from
when the going gets rough. Mathews and Stark’s (shiver, shiver) lawyers took all
the court cases I had issued against the rogue partner, and managed to convince
the judge that it was all cases against (shiver shiver) Mathews and Stark, hence
sic, serial.
All the
judge had to do was look at the court record to see it was all bs. But he
didn't. It wasn't that difficult to pull off. The story was all in the judge's
bias. He took every word they said as gospel truth without proofs, either
because of the shimmering light radiating brightly off their lawyerly robes, or
because cigars had been smoked in the backroom. And he didn’t listen to a single
word I said with proofs either because I was a hiss, hoark, spit, self
litigator, or because cigars hadn’t been smoked in the back room. Either way,
you now have a pretty good idea of how a King's Court must have been run in the
old days.
The rogue partner, who was by now back
on my side because he thought what (shiver, shiver) Mathews and Stark had done
was despicable, and who had been around a courtroom or two in his own right,
said afterwards that he had seen or heard of a lot of people getting screwed in
court before but had never ever seen anything like this. Regrettably, therefore,
I have been forced to accept the inevitable fact this dog won't hunt anymore and
I’ve thrown in the towel. I've decided to use wholelook.com as the humour
website I had planned to launch as the restart backbone for Look.com. Ironically
enough, it is probably a better domain name for what I have eventually planned,
just not as short.
The spiritual path taken calls for
forgiveness. I can go with that. Besides, don't forget, 'Who laughs last thinks
slowest'. The two McGillicuties, Mathews and Stark (shiver, shiver) are no doubt
laughing all the way to the bank by now. It’s a pretty good guess that they
haven't thought this all the through though. As everyone knows, you can't take
it with you through the eye of the needle when the time comes to kick the
bucket. But how you made it goes straight through. This may well turn out to be
the most expensive $575,000 they ever made.
Besides, it's an ill wind that blows no
one any good. I end up with a small silver lining out of all this anyway. The
whole saga of the dot com era, and Look.com in particular and all its foibles,
has become an integral part of my, er, ahem, seminal book of memoirs, 'The
CliffR Project'. The book writes itself. The project is in six parts, all from
the hilarious side of life and runs like a TV mini series. The details are now
all up as website cliffr.com
Plus the
obvious, I get to use this whole mal-adventure to help promote both
wholelook.com and cliffr.com through the Internet as interesting fanfare, such
as this article. The best laid plans of mice and men sometimes often work. Only
time will tell.
Cliff Livingstone.
|